<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DogFriendly.com&#8217;s 2009 Top 10 U.S. Cities to Visit With Your Dog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?feed=rss2&#038;p=42" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42</link>
	<description>Dog news, stories &#38; current events for dog lovers. View our FREE pet travel guides at http://dogfriendly.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:11:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2012 McLaren MP4-12C</title>
		<link>http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42&#038;cpage=2#comment-404271</link>
		<dc:creator>2012 McLaren MP4-12C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 10:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42#comment-404271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;2012 McLaren MP4-12C...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]DogFriendly.com&#8217;s 2009 Top 10 U.S. Cities to Visit With Your Dog &#171; DogFriendly.com&#039;s Dog News[...]...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>2012 McLaren MP4-12C&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]DogFriendly.com&#8217;s 2009 Top 10 U.S. Cities to Visit With Your Dog &laquo; DogFriendly.com&#039;s Dog News[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dees-invisible fence batteries</title>
		<link>http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42&#038;cpage=2#comment-202904</link>
		<dc:creator>dees-invisible fence batteries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 08:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42#comment-202904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never even traveled out of town with a take along my dog ​​because I thought they would interfere with my comfort while traveling. Moreover, we have people who really need attention babies. We just do not want to leave our baby to take care of dogs. Perhaps, after our child is old enough, we will bring our dog when we travel out of town in a long time.

Thank you for valuable information that you write here. Ha I am sure this will be very useful as a guide for those who will now travel to bring their dogs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never even traveled out of town with a take along my dog ​​because I thought they would interfere with my comfort while traveling. Moreover, we have people who really need attention babies. We just do not want to leave our baby to take care of dogs. Perhaps, after our child is old enough, we will bring our dog when we travel out of town in a long time.</p>
<p>Thank you for valuable information that you write here. Ha I am sure this will be very useful as a guide for those who will now travel to bring their dogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sun</title>
		<link>http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42&#038;cpage=2#comment-20479</link>
		<dc:creator>Sun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 06:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42#comment-20479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to agree with San Francisco at the No. 1 spot.  I&#039;ve lived here for 21 years (moved here from Hawaii), but didn&#039;t get a dog until 3 months ago.  I am astounded at the number of open, mixed-use parks that legally allow dogs to be off-leash all day, every day.  I&#039;m not talking a dinky fenced-in &quot;dog park&quot;, but huge areas with gorgeous vistas where I can let my baby run free and unfettered.  And San Francisco is unique in its pet-friendly approach. The surrounding counties have stringent rules/laws about dogs being off-leash, although I&#039;ve noticed that most of the locals ignore them.  Plus, our weather allows many restaurants to set up sidewalk seating, where pets can dine with their owners.  Just came back from a trip in Humboldt County (about 5 hours north of SF on the coast), and there was hardly any sidewalk seating to be had in Eureka or Arcata (the largest towns in the area).  The park plaza in Arcata didn&#039;t allow dogs AT ALL!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with San Francisco at the No. 1 spot.  I&#8217;ve lived here for 21 years (moved here from Hawaii), but didn&#8217;t get a dog until 3 months ago.  I am astounded at the number of open, mixed-use parks that legally allow dogs to be off-leash all day, every day.  I&#8217;m not talking a dinky fenced-in &#8220;dog park&#8221;, but huge areas with gorgeous vistas where I can let my baby run free and unfettered.  And San Francisco is unique in its pet-friendly approach. The surrounding counties have stringent rules/laws about dogs being off-leash, although I&#8217;ve noticed that most of the locals ignore them.  Plus, our weather allows many restaurants to set up sidewalk seating, where pets can dine with their owners.  Just came back from a trip in Humboldt County (about 5 hours north of SF on the coast), and there was hardly any sidewalk seating to be had in Eureka or Arcata (the largest towns in the area).  The park plaza in Arcata didn&#8217;t allow dogs AT ALL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42&#038;cpage=2#comment-12149</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42#comment-12149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I Love your comment Mutts Rule...my husband, my daughter and our 3 Great Danes moved here from Colorado Springs, we have never been so unhappy.  As soon as our lease ends we are also out of here.  I had a male dog jump our fence and try to mate with our female in heat and when I called animal control I was ticketed for not having my dog confined to a metal building with a floor drain while she was in heat.  Come on Give me a break.  My dog was in our backyard, it is fenced, it is our property.   I HATE Kansas City and it&#039;s horrible attitude towards pet owners.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Love your comment Mutts Rule&#8230;my husband, my daughter and our 3 Great Danes moved here from Colorado Springs, we have never been so unhappy.  As soon as our lease ends we are also out of here.  I had a male dog jump our fence and try to mate with our female in heat and when I called animal control I was ticketed for not having my dog confined to a metal building with a floor drain while she was in heat.  Come on Give me a break.  My dog was in our backyard, it is fenced, it is our property.   I HATE Kansas City and it&#8217;s horrible attitude towards pet owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MuttsRule</title>
		<link>http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42&#038;cpage=1#comment-7904</link>
		<dc:creator>MuttsRule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42#comment-7904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just ONE more thing - I promise. A few years ago, Kansas City&#039;s City Market, which is the main farmer&#039;s market in the city, banned dogs even though many people used to enjoy bringing their dogs and I never witnessed any problem. (In fact, watching the dogs was one of the highlights for me.)  They cited health and safety reasons. I actually know of someone who was run off by a security guard just for cutting across the edge of the city market property while walking his dog.

Just one more bit of evidence that Kansas City is a reactionary, draconian place to live that treats dog people like second-class citizens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just ONE more thing &#8211; I promise. A few years ago, Kansas City&#8217;s City Market, which is the main farmer&#8217;s market in the city, banned dogs even though many people used to enjoy bringing their dogs and I never witnessed any problem. (In fact, watching the dogs was one of the highlights for me.)  They cited health and safety reasons. I actually know of someone who was run off by a security guard just for cutting across the edge of the city market property while walking his dog.</p>
<p>Just one more bit of evidence that Kansas City is a reactionary, draconian place to live that treats dog people like second-class citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MuttsRule</title>
		<link>http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42&#038;cpage=1#comment-7903</link>
		<dc:creator>MuttsRule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42#comment-7903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One more thing re: the fact that Kansas City is NOT dog-friendly and is openly hostile to dogs and people with dogs. I just wanted to say that I found this article because I was searching for dog-friendly cities as I research possible places for us (and our tax dollars) to move next year.

I just would hate to see some poor person move to Kansas City because they think it&#039;s dog-friendly because they&#039;d be in for a rude surprise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing re: the fact that Kansas City is NOT dog-friendly and is openly hostile to dogs and people with dogs. I just wanted to say that I found this article because I was searching for dog-friendly cities as I research possible places for us (and our tax dollars) to move next year.</p>
<p>I just would hate to see some poor person move to Kansas City because they think it&#8217;s dog-friendly because they&#8217;d be in for a rude surprise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MuttsRule</title>
		<link>http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42&#038;cpage=1#comment-7902</link>
		<dc:creator>MuttsRule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42#comment-7902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just had to respond to the people who said Kansas City is dog friendly. Kansas City is NOT dog friendly - in fact, much of the city leadership is outright hostile to people with dogs and they act like anything to do with dogs is a big joke. KANSAS CITY LEADERSHIP HATES DOGS AND PEOPLE WITH DOGS and has made it clear that we are not welcome here. Many of us are tired of paying taxes to a city that treats us this way and are planning to move or have already moved to dog-friendlier locales. (Seriously - we have about a year until we can move out of here, and I will never be happier than when I never have to pay another dime to a city that treats me and my family this way.)

Kansas City has only one dog park, and the people who founded it had to fight for a decade or more to get the dog park. (There are a few other dog parks in the suburbs, run by other cities that understand that attracting people with dogs and being progressive is a good thing.) The existing dog park gets short shrift from the parks department and would be nothing but a swamp if not for a great group of volunteers. Our parks are totally empty, yet when people gather informally at parks to let their dogs run off-leash (because there are no dog parks in most neighborhoods) they are routinely ticketed and fined $150 or so. I don&#039;t do this, but can&#039;t blame people who do.

I was involved with efforts to get a second dog park in Kansas City, and the parks board treated us with open hostility and basically told us that they don&#039;t care about anything unless it&#039;s for children. (One particularly horrible and rude parks board member actually said the only thing she cares about is &quot;little black children&quot; and that there will &quot;never be a dog park&quot; on her watch.) We tried to meet with city council members to get support for a dog park and one Kansas City city council member told one of our members who met with him that he is &quot;not a fan of dog parks&quot; and that he thinks &quot;loose dogs should be SHOT on sight.&quot; Does THAT sound like a dog-friendly city to you when we have these types of people leading the city? People who openly tell dog-loving constituents they think dogs should be SHOT??? Sounds like something from some yeehaw out of the freaking Dukes of Hazzard, not from an elected leader of a large, modern American city.

What started out as a really optimistic effort to get a second dog park at an underused park in an area of the city with tons of dogs turned sour. The group worked on it for three years and was screwed over, mistreated and insulted at every turn by the parks board of Kansas City, which was appointed by the Kansas City mayor. The group, WOOF, was willing to raise funds and do everything for this new dog park, and even got a professional architect to volunteer his time to design a beautiful, eco-friendly park. The parks board even appointed a sham task force, then ignored all of their recommendations and quickly threw together their own &quot;recommendations&quot; including putting a dog park on top of a toxic dump that they were advised not to put anything else near until it was properly capped (which it hasn&#039;t been.) That&#039;s where they think dogs and dog people deserve to be - on a landfill. (Oh, and they won&#039;t build that dog park either - since no one wants a park on a dump, there is no advocacy group to lead the charge.) Also, another parks board member said no dog park will ever be built in Kansas City unless there is 100 percent support from all the neighbors. Anyone who has tried to start a dog park knows what a joke that is.

In the meantime, this same parks department/parks board just built a brand new playground because there was something wrong with the surface of an existing playground (nothing wrong with the equipment, just the surface) so they built a whole new playground with all new equipment within a few months, even though there is another playground in the *same park* visible from the newly rebuilt playground, and though they supposedly have no money.

Well, Kansas City parks board, I&#039;m glad you love children so much. Maybe you can pay for all of their tuition to private school when all the dog owners without kids who pay the taxes to send these urban children to school flee the city because you basically gave us the finger and told us we&#039;re not welcome here. Goodbye, and enjoy your crumbling, crappy city!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had to respond to the people who said Kansas City is dog friendly. Kansas City is NOT dog friendly &#8211; in fact, much of the city leadership is outright hostile to people with dogs and they act like anything to do with dogs is a big joke. KANSAS CITY LEADERSHIP HATES DOGS AND PEOPLE WITH DOGS and has made it clear that we are not welcome here. Many of us are tired of paying taxes to a city that treats us this way and are planning to move or have already moved to dog-friendlier locales. (Seriously &#8211; we have about a year until we can move out of here, and I will never be happier than when I never have to pay another dime to a city that treats me and my family this way.)</p>
<p>Kansas City has only one dog park, and the people who founded it had to fight for a decade or more to get the dog park. (There are a few other dog parks in the suburbs, run by other cities that understand that attracting people with dogs and being progressive is a good thing.) The existing dog park gets short shrift from the parks department and would be nothing but a swamp if not for a great group of volunteers. Our parks are totally empty, yet when people gather informally at parks to let their dogs run off-leash (because there are no dog parks in most neighborhoods) they are routinely ticketed and fined $150 or so. I don&#8217;t do this, but can&#8217;t blame people who do.</p>
<p>I was involved with efforts to get a second dog park in Kansas City, and the parks board treated us with open hostility and basically told us that they don&#8217;t care about anything unless it&#8217;s for children. (One particularly horrible and rude parks board member actually said the only thing she cares about is &#8220;little black children&#8221; and that there will &#8220;never be a dog park&#8221; on her watch.) We tried to meet with city council members to get support for a dog park and one Kansas City city council member told one of our members who met with him that he is &#8220;not a fan of dog parks&#8221; and that he thinks &#8220;loose dogs should be SHOT on sight.&#8221; Does THAT sound like a dog-friendly city to you when we have these types of people leading the city? People who openly tell dog-loving constituents they think dogs should be SHOT??? Sounds like something from some yeehaw out of the freaking Dukes of Hazzard, not from an elected leader of a large, modern American city.</p>
<p>What started out as a really optimistic effort to get a second dog park at an underused park in an area of the city with tons of dogs turned sour. The group worked on it for three years and was screwed over, mistreated and insulted at every turn by the parks board of Kansas City, which was appointed by the Kansas City mayor. The group, WOOF, was willing to raise funds and do everything for this new dog park, and even got a professional architect to volunteer his time to design a beautiful, eco-friendly park. The parks board even appointed a sham task force, then ignored all of their recommendations and quickly threw together their own &#8220;recommendations&#8221; including putting a dog park on top of a toxic dump that they were advised not to put anything else near until it was properly capped (which it hasn&#8217;t been.) That&#8217;s where they think dogs and dog people deserve to be &#8211; on a landfill. (Oh, and they won&#8217;t build that dog park either &#8211; since no one wants a park on a dump, there is no advocacy group to lead the charge.) Also, another parks board member said no dog park will ever be built in Kansas City unless there is 100 percent support from all the neighbors. Anyone who has tried to start a dog park knows what a joke that is.</p>
<p>In the meantime, this same parks department/parks board just built a brand new playground because there was something wrong with the surface of an existing playground (nothing wrong with the equipment, just the surface) so they built a whole new playground with all new equipment within a few months, even though there is another playground in the *same park* visible from the newly rebuilt playground, and though they supposedly have no money.</p>
<p>Well, Kansas City parks board, I&#8217;m glad you love children so much. Maybe you can pay for all of their tuition to private school when all the dog owners without kids who pay the taxes to send these urban children to school flee the city because you basically gave us the finger and told us we&#8217;re not welcome here. Goodbye, and enjoy your crumbling, crappy city!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Dog Guy</title>
		<link>http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42&#038;cpage=1#comment-7768</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Dog Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 06:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42#comment-7768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[there are also a lot of great dog friendly beaches in orange county california.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are also a lot of great dog friendly beaches in orange county california.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welch</title>
		<link>http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42&#038;cpage=1#comment-5693</link>
		<dc:creator>Welch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42#comment-5693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m reluctant that the Pit bull wants a specific type of proprietor...these pet dogs, regardless of how &#039;supportive&#039; still have teeth, are nevertheless animals not having moral concepts and once they DO bite, won&#039;t let go. As in all creatures...some often be more suseptable to instinctual habits and time and time once again, this breed tends to complete just that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reluctant that the Pit bull wants a specific type of proprietor&#8230;these pet dogs, regardless of how &#8216;supportive&#8217; still have teeth, are nevertheless animals not having moral concepts and once they DO bite, won&#8217;t let go. As in all creatures&#8230;some often be more suseptable to instinctual habits and time and time once again, this breed tends to complete just that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ML</title>
		<link>http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42&#038;cpage=1#comment-5144</link>
		<dc:creator>ML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogfriendly.com/dognews/?p=42#comment-5144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also Morro Bay and Cayucos along the central coast of California are Very, Very, Very dog friendly.  Some stores in Morro Bay even allow you to bring your dog inside!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also Morro Bay and Cayucos along the central coast of California are Very, Very, Very dog friendly.  Some stores in Morro Bay even allow you to bring your dog inside!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
